Your Sustainability Hub

Tools, Knowledge, Ideas

Calculate your carbon footprint. Master ESG frameworks. Learn from experts. Connect with peers. Get instant answers.

Ascent Partners Foundation, a registered charity under Hong Kong's Inland Revenue Department (IRD) Section 88, is dedicated to making sustainability accessible and actionable. Since 2017, we've connected philanthropic communities with conservation initiatives across Asia-Pacific. Now, we're bringing that expertise to you through practical tools, structured knowledge, and collaborative spaces designed for real-world impact.

What You Can Do Here

Four powerful ways to advance your sustainability journey

Calculation & Modeling Tools

Quantitative assessment tools implementing peer-reviewed methodologies from the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (2004, revised 2015), IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6, 2021-2023), and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations (2017, updated 2021). All calculation engines employ ISO 14064-1:2018 compliant emission factors sourced from IPCC 2006 Guidelines with 2019 Refinement, DEFRA 2023 conversion factors, and EPA eGRID 2022 database. Uncertainty quantification uses Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) with probability distribution functions (PDFs) for activity data and emission factors, reporting 95% confidence intervals per ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM).

  • Carbon Accounting Engine — Organizational greenhouse gas inventory calculator aligned with GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. Implements both activity-based (bottom-up) and spend-based (top-down) calculation methodologies for Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned/controlled sources), Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased electricity, steam, heating, cooling), and Scope 3 (value chain emissions across 15 categories per Corporate Value Chain Standard). Supports operational control, financial control, and equity share consolidation approaches. Emission factors database includes 12,000+ entries from IPCC 2006 (stationary combustion, mobile combustion, fugitive emissions), DEFRA 2023 (UK-specific factors), EPA eGRID 2022 (US electricity grid), IEA 2022 (international electricity), and Ecoinvent 3.9 (life cycle assessment). Calculation engine applies global warming potentials (GWP) from IPCC AR6 (100-year time horizon) for CH₄, N₂O, and fluorinated gases. Includes biogenic carbon accounting per GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Guidance (2023). Output formats: ISO 14064-1:2018 verification-ready reports, CDP Climate Change questionnaire, GRI 305 disclosures.
  • Climate Financial Risk Analyzer — TCFD-compliant scenario analysis tool implementing physical risk assessment (acute hazards: floods, storms, wildfires; chronic risks: temperature rise, sea level rise, precipitation changes) and transition risk modeling (policy/regulatory, technology, market, reputation). Physical risk module uses CMIP6 climate model ensemble data (SSP1-2.6 [1.5-2°C pathway], SSP2-4.5 [2-3°C pathway], SSP5-8.5 [>4°C pathway]) at 0.25° spatial resolution with downscaling via bias-correction spatial disaggregation (BCSD). Asset-level exposure assessment employs geospatial analysis of facility locations against hazard layers from World Resources Institute Aqueduct (water stress), Global Forest Watch (wildfire), and UNEP GRID (coastal flooding). Transition risk quantification models carbon pricing scenarios (IEA Net Zero by 2050, NGFS Phase 3 scenarios), technology disruption curves (learning rates for renewable energy, battery storage, green hydrogen), and stranded asset valuation using discounted cash flow analysis with climate-adjusted discount rates. Financial impact calculation integrates value-at-risk (VaR) methodology with climate beta factors. Outputs include TCFD-aligned disclosure templates, EU Taxonomy alignment assessment, and ISSB S2 climate-related disclosures.
  • Net Zero Pathway Optimizer — Science-based target calculator implementing SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard (v1.1, 2023) with near-term (5-10 years) and long-term (2050) target validation. Employs sectoral decarbonization approach (SDA) using IEA Energy Technology Perspectives 2023 sectoral pathways for power generation, buildings, transport, industry, and agriculture. Marginal abatement cost curve (MACC) optimization engine evaluates 200+ decarbonization measures with technology-specific learning rates, capital expenditure requirements, operational cost impacts, and implementation timelines. Scope 1+2 target calculation uses absolute contraction or intensity-based methods (per revenue, per unit production) aligned with well-below 2°C or 1.5°C scenarios. Scope 3 target setting applies supplier engagement targets (67% of suppliers by emissions set SBTs within 5 years) and value chain reduction targets using SBTi FLAG (Forest, Land and Agriculture) guidance for biogenic emissions. Carbon removal quantification distinguishes between nature-based solutions (afforestation, soil carbon sequestration) and technological removal (direct air capture, bioenergy with CCS) per Oxford Offsetting Principles. Validation against SBTi criteria includes ambition check (minimum 4.2% annual linear reduction for 1.5°C alignment), boundary completeness (>95% Scope 1+2, >67% Scope 3), and neutralization claims compliance.
Start Calculating

Standards & Frameworks Repository

Comprehensive technical documentation repository covering international sustainability disclosure standards, reporting frameworks, and assurance protocols. Includes sector-specific implementation guides, materiality assessment matrices (double materiality per EFRAG, financial materiality per SASB), cross-framework mapping tables aligned with ISSB consolidation roadmap, and interoperability guidance for concurrent compliance with multiple standards. All documentation updated to reflect latest revisions including ISSB standards effective January 2024, GRI Universal Standards 2021, ESRS (European Sustainability Reporting Standards) under CSRD, and TNFD v1.0 final recommendations (September 2023).

  • GRI Universal Standards 2021 — Global Reporting Initiative modular sustainability reporting framework comprising 3 universal standards (GRI 1: Foundation 2021, GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021, GRI 3: Material Topics 2021) and 33 topic-specific standards across economic (GRI 201-207), environmental (GRI 301-308), and social (GRI 401-418) dimensions. Implements stakeholder-inclusive double materiality assessment methodology evaluating both impact materiality (organization's effects on economy, environment, people) and financial materiality (sustainability matters affecting enterprise value). Topic selection process follows four-step approach: understand context, identify actual/potential impacts, assess significance of impacts, prioritize most significant impacts for reporting. Disclosure requirements include management approach (policies, commitments, goals, responsibilities, resources, grievance mechanisms, actions) and topic-specific metrics with mandatory disaggregation by geography, business unit, and demographic factors. Sector Standards Program provides tailored guidance for 40 high-impact sectors including oil & gas, coal, agriculture, apparel, financial services. Reporting principles ensure accuracy, balance, clarity, comparability, completeness, sustainability context, timeliness, and verifiability per GRI 1. Compatible with ISSB standards, ESRS, and CDP questionnaires through published mapping tables.
  • IFRS S1/S2 (ISSB Standards) — International Sustainability Standards Board baseline disclosure standards effective January 1, 2024. IFRS S1 (General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information) establishes core content and presentation requirements using four-pillar structure: governance (oversight and management), strategy (resilience, scenario analysis), risk management (identification, assessment, prioritization), metrics and targets (performance measurement, target-setting). Requires disclosure of all sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably affect entity's cash flows, access to finance, or cost of capital over short, medium, or long term. IFRS S2 (Climate-related Disclosures) specifies climate-specific requirements building on TCFD recommendations with enhanced Scope 3 value chain emissions disclosure (all 15 categories per GHG Protocol), financed emissions for financial institutions, climate resilience assessment using scenario analysis (minimum 1.5°C scenario required), and industry-based metrics from SASB Standards (77 industries). Materiality assessment follows financial materiality lens (reasonable investor test) distinct from GRI's impact materiality. Transition relief provisions allow phased implementation: Scope 3 emissions (1-year delay), comparative information (1-year exemption), TCFD alignment (interim reporting permitted). Assurance requirements align with ISAE 3410 (greenhouse gas statements) and emerging ISSA 5000 (sustainability assurance) standards.
  • TNFD v1.0 Final Recommendations — Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures framework (September 2023) for organizational reporting on nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities. Employs LEAP approach for assessment: Locate interface with nature (identify business activities, value chain, assets in ecologically sensitive areas using spatial analysis tools), Evaluate dependencies and impacts (assess reliance on ecosystem services and effects on biodiversity using ENCORE database, IBAT, STAR metrics), Assess material risks and opportunities (prioritize nature-related risks using risk matrices, identify business opportunities in nature-positive solutions), Prepare to respond and report (develop strategy, governance, risk management, set targets). Disclosure framework mirrors TCFD structure with 14 recommended disclosures across governance (4 disclosures), strategy (5 disclosures including scenario analysis, value chain assessment), risk and impact management (3 disclosures), metrics and targets (2 disclosures plus sector-specific metrics). Core global metrics include dependencies on ecosystem services, impacts on biodiversity (MSA.km², STAR), footprint indicators (land use, freshwater use, GHG emissions, pollution), and nature-positive targets aligned with Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (30x30 targets). Sector guidance available for agriculture, food & beverage, forestry & paper, extractives & minerals processing, biotechnology & pharmaceuticals. Integrates with Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) methods for target validation and Natural Capital Protocol for valuation.
Browse Resources

Structured Learning Curricula

Evidence-based professional development programs co-developed with academic institutions (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, University of Melbourne) and industry bodies (GRI, CDP, SASB Alliance). Curricula employ competency-based learning design with Bloom's taxonomy alignment, incorporating real-world case studies, hands-on assessment tools, and certification pathways recognized by professional credentialing organizations. All courses include pre-assessment diagnostics, formative assessments, capstone projects, and continuing professional development (CPD) credits applicable to CFA ESG Investing Certificate, GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Certificate, and EFFAS CESGA certification.

  • Biodiversity Impact Assessment Practitioner — 40-hour certification program covering TNFD LEAP methodology (Locate, Evaluate, Assess, Prepare) with practical application of spatial analysis tools (QGIS, ArcGIS Pro, Google Earth Engine) for identifying business-nature interface. Ecosystem service valuation module employs InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs) models for carbon storage, water purification, pollination, and coastal protection quantification. Biodiversity metric frameworks include UK Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG 4.0 metric), Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) methods for land, freshwater, ocean, and biodiversity targets, and IBAT (Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool) for protected area screening. Practical exercises use real corporate datasets to conduct dependency and impact assessments using ENCORE (Exploring Natural Capital Opportunities, Risks and Exposure) database covering 21 ecosystem services across 167 economic sectors. Final project requires completion of TNFD-aligned disclosure covering all 14 recommended disclosures with third-party review. Recognized by TNFD Forum as approved training provider.
  • Carbon Accounting Practitioner Certificate — 60-hour professional certification aligned with ISO 14064-1:2018 and GHG Protocol Corporate Standard. Covers organizational boundary setting using operational control, financial control, and equity share approaches with practical exercises in complex ownership structures (joint ventures, franchises, outsourced operations). Emission factor database training includes navigation of IPCC 2006 Guidelines (5 volumes, 2019 Refinement), DEFRA 2023 conversion factors (1,400+ emission factors), EPA eGRID 2022 (US electricity grid subregions), IEA 2022 (international electricity emission factors for 150+ countries), and Ecoinvent 3.9 LCA database (18,000+ processes). Scope 3 value chain emissions module provides detailed guidance on all 15 categories with calculation methodologies (supplier-specific, hybrid, spend-based, average-data) and data quality assessment using GHG Protocol Data Quality Indicators (TER: technology, temporal, geographical representativeness). Uncertainty quantification employs Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) with probability distributions (normal, lognormal, triangular) for activity data and emission factors, reporting combined uncertainty per GUM (Guide to Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement). Capstone project requires completion of ISO 14064-1 verification-ready inventory with third-party limited assurance. Approved by GHG Management Institute and recognized for 12 CPD credits.
  • ESG Integration for SMEs Workshop Series — 32-hour modular program tailored for small and medium enterprises implementing ESG management systems. Materiality assessment module employs SASB Materiality Map (77 industries, 26 sustainability topics) and GRI sector standards with stakeholder engagement protocols following AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard (identification, prioritization, engagement planning, dialogue methods, response mechanisms). Double materiality assessment training covers both impact materiality (inside-out perspective on organization's effects on stakeholders and environment) and financial materiality (outside-in perspective on sustainability matters affecting enterprise value) per EFRAG guidance. KPI development workshop establishes SMART targets (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) with alignment to UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and selection of appropriate metrics from GRI Standards, SASB Standards, and EU ESRS. Governance module covers board oversight structures, ESG committee establishment, executive compensation linkage, and policy development. Data management training includes ESG data collection systems, internal controls, assurance readiness, and disclosure preparation for CDP questionnaires, GRI reports, and sustainability-linked financing documentation. Final deliverable: complete ESG strategy document with 3-year roadmap, governance structure, material topics matrix, KPI dashboard, and stakeholder engagement plan.
Start Learning

Practitioner Network

Professionally moderated community of 1,500+ verified sustainability practitioners including ESG analysts, carbon accountants, sustainability managers, climate risk specialists, and biodiversity consultants. Network employs structured discussion forums organized by technical domain (GHG accounting, climate risk, biodiversity, social impact, governance), industry sector (financial services, energy, manufacturing, agriculture, technology), and geographic region (Asia-Pacific, Europe, Americas). Moderation team includes subject matter experts with professional credentials (CFA ESG, GRI Certified Trainer, ISO 14064 Lead Verifier, TNFD Forum members). Includes monthly expert AMAs (Ask Me Anything) with standard-setters, quarterly working group summits, and annual practitioner conference. Member verification requires professional email, LinkedIn profile review, and optional credential validation.

  • Best Practice Repository — Curated library of 200+ peer-reviewed case studies documenting real-world sustainability implementations across diverse sectors and geographies. Each case study follows standardized template: organization profile, challenge description, methodology selection rationale, implementation approach, stakeholder engagement process, data collection and management, results quantification, lessons learned, and scalability assessment. Includes financial analysis (capital expenditure, operational costs, ROI calculation, payback period) and non-financial impacts (risk mitigation, stakeholder satisfaction, regulatory compliance, reputational benefits). Case studies cover carbon neutrality roadmaps, science-based target setting, Scope 3 value chain engagement, TCFD scenario analysis implementation, nature-positive strategies, circular economy transitions, and social impact measurement. Downloadable implementation templates include project charters, stakeholder maps, data collection forms, calculation spreadsheets, disclosure drafts, and assurance preparation checklists. All case studies undergo peer review by minimum three practitioners with relevant sector experience before publication. Updated quarterly with new submissions from network members.
  • Technical Q&A Forums — Moderated discussion boards addressing methodology challenges, data quality issues, framework interpretation, and technical implementation questions. Forums organized by topic areas: GHG accounting (organizational boundaries, emission factor selection, uncertainty quantification, biogenic carbon), climate risk (scenario selection, asset-level assessment, financial impact quantification), biodiversity (spatial analysis, metric selection, dependency assessment), social metrics (human rights due diligence, living wage calculation, diversity metrics), and governance (materiality assessment, board oversight, assurance preparation). Expert moderators (minimum 10 years experience, professional credentials) provide authoritative responses within 48 hours, citing relevant standards, technical guidance, and academic literature. Community members can upvote responses, mark solutions, and contribute alternative approaches. Archive contains 5,000+ resolved questions searchable by keyword, standard reference, industry sector, and topic tag. Monthly digest highlights most viewed questions, emerging topics, and standard updates. Integration with official guidance from GRI, ISSB, TNFD, SBTi, and CDP ensures alignment with latest methodological developments.
  • Collaborative Working Groups — Time-bound collaborative initiatives (6-12 months) addressing emerging methodological challenges and developing practical guidance for network members. Current active working groups: Scope 3 Category 15 (investments) calculation methodologies for non-financial corporates, nature-positive metrics and target-setting aligned with SBTN and GBF 30x30 goals, social taxonomy development building on EU Taxonomy model, financed emissions calculation for asset managers and banks, climate adaptation metrics and resilience indicators, circular economy measurement frameworks, and biodiversity credits and offsets quality criteria. Each working group comprises 15-25 practitioners with relevant expertise, meets bi-weekly via video conference, maintains shared documentation repository, and produces public deliverables (methodology papers, calculation tools, implementation guides, case studies). Working group outputs undergo public consultation period (30 days) before final publication. Past working group deliverables include Scope 3 Category 11 (use of sold products) guidance for consumer electronics sector (2022), TCFD scenario analysis template for SMEs (2023), and biodiversity materiality assessment framework for financial institutions (2023). Open call for new working group proposals issued quarterly with selection based on member voting and strategic alignment.
Join the Conversation

Platform Ecosystem

Access specialized platforms for biodiversity, ESG education, and academic research. All platforms are free and supported by charitable donations.

Ready to Take Action?

Whether you're measuring your first carbon footprint or building a comprehensive sustainability strategy, we're here to help you succeed.

3
Interactive Calculators
1,500+
Forum Participants
3
UN Partnerships
2017
Established